1
Own funds documentation
For clients who need to explain where theircrypto wealth came from.
We reconstruct the origin and movement of crypto assets and prepare structured Source-of-Funds documentation for exchanges, banks, tax authorities, law firms and due diligence reviews.
This service helps clients respond to account restrictions, bank or tax authority requests, and third-party due diligence checks by turning complex crypto transaction histories into clear, evidence-based documentation.
For clients who need to explain where theircrypto wealth came from.
For blocked accounts, pending withdrawals or enhanced due diligence checks.
For disputes, tax matters, legal submissions or independent verification.
For transactions, investments, settlementsor business relationships.
Submit thebasic details of your case. We will review the request, identify what evidenceis likely needed, and explain the next steps before any detailed investigationbegins.
What happens next:
✓ Review of your request
✓ Initial assessment of documentation needed
✓ Clarification of scope and next steps
✓ Proposal for report preparation, if suitable
A structuredprocess that connects wallet activity, exchange records, bank statements andsupporting documents into a clear evidence-based explanation.
Map wallets, exchanges and relevant transactionflows.
Collect and structure bank statements, exchangeexports and wallet data.
Reconstruct the transaction chain into achronological timeline.
Match off-chain records with on-chain activity.
Identify gaps, inconsistencies and riskindicators where relevant.
Prepare the report and support follow-uprequests.
Wallet and exchange accountmapping
Chronological transactiontimeline
Source and destination analysis
Cross-chain flow reconstruction
Comparison with bank andexchange records
Structured annexes for review
Risk indicators andinconsistencies
Follow-up support for reviewingparties
Crypto source of funds cases require more than transaction exports. These examples show how we reconstruct complex trading histories, compare reported claims with on-chain evidence, and prepare documentation that can be reviewed by banks, law firms and tax authorities.
A prominent UK law firm approached us on behalf of a client who was experiencing issues with his bank while cashing out crypto assets.
The client needed a full source of funds report covering more than seven years of intensive crypto trading across multiple blockchains. The matter required a clear reconstruction of the client's crypto activity and supporting documentation that could be reviewed by financial and tax authorities.
We conducted an in-depth investigation of the client's complete crypto trading history. In total, we analysed and mapped over 20,000 transactions, identified more than 200 services used by the client, and examined over €100,000,000 in total transaction volume.
We produced multiple source of funds documents, which were accepted by the client's bank and later also by the tax authorities.
In early 2026, a European tax agency contacted us to verify a substantial volume of transactions reported by an individual who claimed the funds came from crypto trading over several years.
The tax authority needed an independent review of the submitted report to determine whether the individual's claims were supported by actual on-chain evidence.
We conducted a thorough crypto tracing investigation and compared the claims in the submitted report against the corresponding blockchain activity. We reviewed the transaction flows, supporting wallet data, and relevant on-chain evidence.
We prepared a forensic report with accompanying on-chain evidence, confirming certain claims and disputing others where the submitted information did not match the blockchain data.
Crypto Source-of-Funds verification is the process of reconstructing and documenting where crypto assets came from, how they moved, and whether the available evidence supports a clear explanation of their origin. It usually combines blockchain analysis, wallet mapping, exchange records, bank statements and supporting documents into a structured report for review by exchanges, banks, tax authorities, legal teams or compliance departments.
You may need a Source-of-Funds report when an exchange restricts your account, a bank asks for proof of origin, a tax authority reviews crypto-related income, or a legal team needs independent evidence of crypto wealth. It can also be used in third-party due diligence before a transaction, investment, settlement, inheritance matter or business relationship.
Yes. If an exchange account is restricted, a Source-of-Funds report can help organise the evidence needed to explain the origin and movement of funds. The report can map relevant wallets, exchange accounts, transactions and supporting documents into a structured explanation that the exchange compliance team can review. Acceptance always depends on the exchange and the quality of the underlying evidence.
Typical documents include wallet addresses, transaction hashes, exchange exports, trading history, bank statements, purchase records, sale records, tax filings, contracts, invoices, screenshots of relevant account activity and any request received from the bank, exchange or authority. The exact documentation depends on the case, the time period under review and there viewing party’s requirements.
A crypto Source-of-Funds report can include wallet and exchange account mapping, a chronological transaction timeline, source and destination analysis, cross-chain flow reconstruction, comparison with bank and exchange records, structured annexes, risk indicators, inconsistencies and follow-up support for reviewing parties.
Yes. Source-of-Funds reviews often involve activity across multiple wallets, exchanges, chains and services. The purpose of the review is to reconstruct the relevant transaction history and connect on-chain activity with off-chain records such as bank transfers, exchange exports and supporting documents.
No. Source-of-Funds verification is also useful before a restriction occurs. Individuals, companies, investors, law firms and advisors may request a report proactively when preparing for a bank review, tax review, transaction, investment, legal process or third-party due diligence assessment.
Yes. A structured Source-of-Funds report can be prepared for review by banks, tax authorities, legal teams, compliance departments and other relevant parties. The report is designed to present the origin and movement of crypto assets in a clear, evidence-based format. Final acceptance depends on the reviewing institution or authority.
Yes. Source-of-Funds analysis can support third-party wealth checks where crypto assets need to be assessed before a transaction, investment, settlement, business relationship or legal process. The analysis can help identify whether the available evidence supports the claimed origin and movement of funds.
Yes. A structured Source-of-Funds report can be prepared for review by banks, tax authorities, legal teams, compliance departments and other relevant parties. The report is designed to present the origin and movement of crypto assets in a clear, evidence-based format. Final acceptance depends on the reviewing institution or authority.
The timeline depends on the number of wallets, exchanges, transactions, chains and supporting documents involved. A simple review may be completed faster, while complex trading histories covering several years and thousands of transactions require more time. The first step is usually an initial assessment of the scope and required documentation.
No. No independent provider can guarantee acceptance by a bank, exchange, tax authority or compliance department. Acceptance depends on the reviewing party’s internal standards, the completeness of the evidence and the underlying transaction history. The purpose of the report is to provide a clear, structured and evidence-based explanation.
A transaction export is usually just raw data from an exchange, wallet or blockchain explorer. A Source-of-Funds report interprets that data, connects it with supporting documents and explains the transaction history in a structured way. The report is designed to help reviewing parties understand the origin, movement and evidentiary support behind the cryptoassets.
Yes. A Source-of-Funds review can identify missing records, unsupported claims, inconsistencies between bank and exchange data, unexplained wallet movements, incomplete transaction histories or risk indicators that may require clarification. Identifying these issues early can help prepare a more coherent submission.
Yes. Source-of-Funds reviews often involve sensitive financial, legal and personal information. The information submitted is reviewed for the purpose of assessing the case, identifying required documentation and preparing the relevant scope of work. Sensitive files should be shared through appropriate secure channels.
You can start by submitting the basic details of the case, including the reason for the review, the reviewing party involved, the relevant wallets or exchanges and a short description of the issue. The next step is an initial assessment of the documentation needed, clarification of scope and, where suitable, a proposal for report preparation.
Submit thebasic details of the case. The next step is a review of the request,clarification of required documentation and a scope proposal where suitable.
Start source of funds review